Preliminary Course.
Plant and crop Models
Structural Models (2)
Pros and cons of structural models
Structural model advantages
* Such model builds the plant structure in 3D, offering a fast qualitative data and process check
* With appropriate bases and rules, a structural model can faithfully simulate the structure development of real plants.
* Structural models offer a framework for hosting many applications where plant geometry is required:
-
- Mechanical behaviour
- Pest interactions
- Comparisons with Lidar, radar, photometric images or acquisitions
- SImulation of specific crop management sequences, such as pruning
- Fine radiative simulation
- etc.
* Structural models specify the plant geometry and the underlying structure topology
* Structural models allow stochastic structure representations
* Structural models usually show a nice genericity, allowing studies on a wide range of herbs, shrubs, trees
Structural model limitations
* Structural models do not consider functioning, their interest in agronomy is thus very limited:
-
- geometrical organ sizes, including internode lengths and diameters must be fitted from data or empirically defined
- girth growth (secondary growth) is ignored
- plant structure plasticity cannot be efficiently studied
- environmental effects are difficult to integrate
- early and older development stages cannot usually be simulated from mature stage parameterization
- ...
* Such models specify the structure, leading to high memory and computing costs on large trees
* The approach is independent from all environmental, climatic and resource conditions
* Extension from a single plant to a crop or stand is difficult and hazardous